Quick answer: On 13 October 2026, the engine identified a bullish setup on EUR/CAD during the London session. The trade was initiated based on a structural shift, sell-side liquidity sweep, and fair value gap. Despite these confirmations, price failed to reach TP1 and eventually triggered our stop-loss. The trade concluded with a -1R loss after six hours of active management.

EUR/CAD BUY H1 chart with entry, stop and targets

*Real H1 chart: blue = entry, red = stop, green = TP1-TP3. Times in UTC.*

The setup: why the engine took it

The engine identified a buying opportunity on EUR/CAD based on institutional price action principles. First, the higher timeframe bias was established as bullish. We observed a sweep of sell-side liquidity, indicating that sell-stop orders were likely triggered below previous lows, providing fuel for a reversal. The Change of Character (CHoCH) confirmed a shift in order flow to the upside. An entry was selected within the discount zone, supported by a fair value gap (FVG) left by the upward displacement. Note that this trade was executed under the legacy Smart Money engine rules, prior to the adoption of our current five-check verification protocol on 15 October 2026.

The trade plan

| Item | Value |

| :--- | :--- |

| Entry | 1.59491 |

| Stop loss | 1.59236 |

| TP1 | 1.59872 |

| TP2 | 1.60127 |

| TP3 | 1.60508 |

| Risk (pips) | 25.5 |

| Order type | LIMIT |

| Session | London |

What happened

| Time (UTC) | Event |

| :--- | :--- |

| 07:00 | Signal published |

| 08:00 | Order filled at 1.59491 |

| 13:00 | Stop loss touched at 1.59236 |

| 14:00 | Trade closed |

The trade was filled one hour after the signal was issued. Price fluctuated for six hours, reaching a maximum move of 13 pips in our favour, or 0.51R, before failing to hold the structure. As price reversed and hit the stop-loss level, the position was automatically closed to prevent further exposure.

Result

The outcome was a full stop-loss hit. We incurred a loss of 25.5 pips, resulting in a -1R return. Because the price failed to reach TP1, none of the position management rules (such as moving the stop to breakeven) were triggered. Consequently, the full risk was realized upon the stop-loss being touched.

What this trade teaches

Frequently asked questions

Why was the trade closed after 6 hours?

The trade was closed at 14:00 UTC because the stop-loss level of 1.59236 was triggered by price action at 13:00 UTC. Once a stop-loss is hit, our system records the trade as finished. There was no need for a manual time-based exit because the market invalidated our entry criteria within the standard trading window.

How does the rule change on 15 October 2026 affect this result?

This trade occurred two days before the implementation of our current five-check engine rules. The new system is designed to provide stricter filtering for trade entries. While this specific trade lost money under the old rules, we are continuously monitoring the impact of the updated criteria on future trade outcomes.

Why did the trade move 13 pips in our favour but fail to hit TP1?

Price action requires significant momentum to reach the first target at 1.59872. While the pair moved 13 pips, this was not enough to overcome the selling pressure that ultimately pushed the price back through our entry point. The move simply lacked the necessary institutional participation to sustain the bullish structure required for our take-profit levels.

Every signal, win or lose, is on the record: weekly results · how the signals are built · today's signals · get free signals.

*Educational only, not financial advice. Past results do not guarantee future results.*

Blog | Tebotechsignals
Skip to main content
EUR/CAD Buy Case Study (13 Oct 2026): Bullish ICT Setup, SL -1R
case studies
October 28, 2026

TebotechSignals Research Team

Institutional FX Analysts · ICT Smart Money Concepts Specialists

EUR/CAD Buy Case Study (13 Oct 2026): Bullish ICT Setup, SL -1R

Analyzing a EUR/CAD long signal from 13 October 2026 that resulted in a full stop-loss hit. Lessons on price action, displacement, and trade management.

#Forex
#EURCAD
#Loss
#SMC
#ICT

📘 Reading Price Like the Big Players

Liquidity, order blocks and market structure — explained in plain English. Just $10.00.

Get It

📘 Trading Without the Drama

Fixing risk management, discipline and misinformation — explained in plain English. Just $10.00.

Get It
🏆
Sponsored · Keller, TX

Celebrate Your Next Win With a Custom Cake 🎂

Quick answer: On 13 October 2026, the engine identified a bullish setup on EUR/CAD during the London session. The trade was initiated based on a structural shift, sell-side liquidity sweep, and fair value gap. Despite these confirmations, price failed to reach TP1 and eventually triggered our stop-loss. The trade concluded with a -1R loss after six hours of active management.

EUR/CAD BUY H1 chart with entry, stop and targets

Real H1 chart: blue = entry, red = stop, green = TP1-TP3. Times in UTC.

The setup: why the engine took it

The engine identified a buying opportunity on EUR/CAD based on institutional price action principles. First, the higher timeframe bias was established as bullish. We observed a sweep of sell-side liquidity, indicating that sell-stop orders were likely triggered below previous lows, providing fuel for a reversal. The Change of Character (CHoCH) confirmed a shift in order flow to the upside. An entry was selected within the discount zone, supported by a fair value gap (FVG) left by the upward displacement. Note that this trade was executed under the legacy Smart Money engine rules, prior to the adoption of our current five-check verification protocol on 15 October 2026.

The trade plan

| Item | Value | | :--- | :--- | | Entry | 1.59491 | | Stop loss | 1.59236 | | TP1 | 1.59872 | | TP2 | 1.60127 | | TP3 | 1.60508 | | Risk (pips) | 25.5 | | Order type | LIMIT | | Session | London |

What happened

| Time (UTC) | Event | | :--- | :--- | | 07:00 | Signal published | | 08:00 | Order filled at 1.59491 | | 13:00 | Stop loss touched at 1.59236 | | 14:00 | Trade closed |

The trade was filled one hour after the signal was issued. Price fluctuated for six hours, reaching a maximum move of 13 pips in our favour, or 0.51R, before failing to hold the structure. As price reversed and hit the stop-loss level, the position was automatically closed to prevent further exposure.

Result

The outcome was a full stop-loss hit. We incurred a loss of 25.5 pips, resulting in a -1R return. Because the price failed to reach TP1, none of the position management rules (such as moving the stop to breakeven) were triggered. Consequently, the full risk was realized upon the stop-loss being touched.

What this trade teaches

  1. Market reaction: Despite the presence of a FVG and a liquidity sweep, the maximum favorable excursion was only 0.51R. This serves as a reminder that institutional setups do not guarantee an immediate move to the target levels.
  2. Time management: The trade stayed active for six hours before hitting the stop loss. This highlights the importance of patience, but also that sustained consolidation after entry can often precede a reversal rather than a breakout.
  3. Risk control: The stop-loss was placed at 25.5 pips, based on the structure of the discount zone. By accepting the full -1R, we ensured the loss remained contained according to our risk management plan, preventing a larger drawdown during the afternoon session.

Frequently asked questions

Why was the trade closed after 6 hours?

The trade was closed at 14:00 UTC because the stop-loss level of 1.59236 was triggered by price action at 13:00 UTC. Once a stop-loss is hit, our system records the trade as finished. There was no need for a manual time-based exit because the market invalidated our entry criteria within the standard trading window.

How does the rule change on 15 October 2026 affect this result?

This trade occurred two days before the implementation of our current five-check engine rules. The new system is designed to provide stricter filtering for trade entries. While this specific trade lost money under the old rules, we are continuously monitoring the impact of the updated criteria on future trade outcomes.

Why did the trade move 13 pips in our favour but fail to hit TP1?

Price action requires significant momentum to reach the first target at 1.59872. While the pair moved 13 pips, this was not enough to overcome the selling pressure that ultimately pushed the price back through our entry point. The move simply lacked the necessary institutional participation to sustain the bullish structure required for our take-profit levels.

Every signal, win or lose, is on the record: weekly results · how the signals are built · today's signals · get free signals.

Educational only, not financial advice. Past results do not guarantee future results.

🏆
Sponsored · Keller, TX

Celebrate Your Next Win With a Custom Cake 🎂

📲 Get Free Daily Signals on WhatsApp

Follow our free channel for daily market briefs, ICT signals, and SMC education — delivered straight to your WhatsApp.

Join Free →

Disclaimer: This site is an educational platform. All content — including courses, articles, and any market commentary — is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or professional advice, a recommendation, or a solicitation to trade. It is general in nature and does not take into account your individual financial situation, objectives, or needs. All trading and investing involve risk of loss; past performance is not indicative of future results. Always conduct your own research and consult a licensed professional before making any financial decisions. Client and testimonial experiences may not be typical — individual results will vary. Full fee structure is disclosed on our Pricing page.

We use cookies for essential site functionality and, with your consent, for analytics and advertising (Google Analytics, Facebook, Bing) to understand traffic and improve TebotechSignals. See our Privacy Policy for details.