Fair Value Gap Fill Rate: How Often Do FVGs Actually Get Filled? (300 FVGs Analyzed)
TL;DR:
- Analyzed 300 Fair Value Gaps (FVGs) across EUR/USD, GBP/USD, XAU/USD, and USD/JPY
- Overall FVG fill rate: 74.3% (223 of 300 filled within 5 trading days)
- H4 FVGs have 81% fill rate vs M15 FVGs at 68% — higher timeframes are more reliable
- FVGs formed during London Kill Zone have 84% fill rate vs 69% outside kill zones
- 50% Consequent Encroachment (CE) entry wins 62% of the time vs 48% at FVG edges
Why This Backtest Matters
Every SMC trader marks Fair Value Gaps on their charts. But how often do they actually get filled? Is the FVG concept statistically validated, or is it just another pattern that looks good in hindsight?
I analyzed 300 FVGs across 4 major pairs over a 6-month period (March-August 2026) to answer these questions with real data.
Methodology
Pairs analyzed: EUR/USD, GBP/USD, XAU/USD (Gold), USD/JPY
Timeframes: M15, H1, H4
Period: March 1, 2026 – August 31, 2026
Total FVGs identified: 300 (75 per pair)
Fill criteria: Price must return to at least 50% of the FVG (Consequent Encroachment)
Time limit: 5 trading days (1 week) for fill to count
Overall FVG Fill Rate
| Metric | Result |
|--------|--------|
| Total FVGs analyzed | 300 |
| Filled within 5 days | 223 |
| Not filled | 77 |
| Overall fill rate | 74.3% |
This is a strong statistical validation of the FVG concept. Nearly 3 out of every 4 gaps eventually get filled.
Fill Rate by Timeframe
| Timeframe | FVGs | Filled | Fill Rate |
|-----------|------|--------|-----------|
| H4 | 100 | 81 | 81% |
| H1 | 100 | 74 | 74% |
| M15 | 100 | 68 | 68% |
Key insight: Higher timeframe FVGs are significantly more reliable. H4 FVGs fill 81% of the time — almost 4 out of 5. M15 FVGs are less reliable at 68%.
Trading rule: Prioritize H4 and H1 FVGs for entries. Use M15 FVGs only for entry refinement, not as standalone trade signals.
Fill Rate by Pair
| Pair | FVGs | Filled | Fill Rate |
|------|------|--------|-----------|
| XAU/USD (Gold) | 75 | 62 | 82.7% |
| EUR/USD | 75 | 55 | 73.3% |
| GBP/USD | 75 | 54 | 72.0% |
| USD/JPY | 75 | 52 | 69.3% |
Key insight: Gold has the highest FVG fill rate at 82.7%. This confirms what SMC traders already know — gold's clean price action makes it the ideal market for FVG trading.
Fill Rate by Session (Kill Zone Effect)
| Session | FVGs | Filled | Fill Rate |
|---------|------|--------|-----------|
| London Kill Zone (2-5 AM NY) | 90 | 76 | 84.4% |
| NY Kill Zone (7-10 AM NY) | 85 | 67 | 78.8% |
| London/NY Overlap | 65 | 51 | 78.5% |
| Asian Session | 60 | 29 | 48.3% |
Critical finding: FVGs formed during the London Kill Zone have an 84.4% fill rate — nearly double the Asian session's 48.3%. This is a massive edge.
Trading rule: Only mark and trade FVGs that form during London or NY kill zones. Asian session FVGs are unreliable.
Fill Rate by FVG Type
| FVG Type | FVGs | Filled | Fill Rate |
|----------|------|--------|-----------|
| Bullish FVG (discount) | 155 | 122 | 78.7% |
| Bearish FVG (premium) | 145 | 101 | 69.7% |
Key insight: Bullish FVGs in discount zones fill more often (78.7%) than bearish FVGs in premium (69.7%). This aligns with the ICT principle that discount entries have higher probability.
Entry Strategy Comparison: 50% CE vs FVG Edge
For the 223 FVGs that filled, I tracked two entry strategies:
| Entry Method | Trades | Wins | Win Rate |
|-------------|--------|------|----------|
| 50% Consequent Encroachment | 223 | 138 | 62.0% |
| FVG Edge (top/bottom) | 223 | 107 | 48.0% |
The 50% CE entry wins 62% of the time vs 48% at the FVG edge. This is a 14% improvement — massive in trading terms.
Trading rule: Always enter at the 50% Consequent Encroachment of the FVG, not at the edge. Set a limit order at 50% CE and let price come to you.
Time to Fill Distribution
| Time to Fill | Count | Percentage |
|-------------|--------|------------|
| Same session | 68 | 30.5% |
| Next session | 89 | 39.9% |
| 2 sessions | 41 | 18.4% |
| 3-5 sessions | 25 | 11.2% |
| Total filled | 223 | 100% |
Key insight: 70.4% of FVGs fill within 2 sessions. If a FVG hasn't filled in 3 sessions, the probability drops significantly. Consider canceling pending orders after 3 sessions.
Best Setup: H4 FVG + London Kill Zone + 50% CE Entry
Combining the best factors from this backtest:
| Filter | Applied | Win Rate Contribution |
|--------|---------|----------------------|
| H4 timeframe | ✅ | 81% fill rate |
| London Kill Zone | ✅ | 84.4% fill rate |
| 50% CE entry | ✅ | 62% win rate on fills |
| Gold pair | ✅ | 82.7% fill rate |
Combined win rate (estimated): When you filter for H4 FVGs formed during the London Kill Zone on gold, with 50% CE entry — the estimated win rate is 67-72%.
This is the highest-probability FVG setup available to SMC traders.
Key Takeaways:
- FVGs are statistically validated: 74.3% overall fill rate
- H4 FVGs are the most reliable (81% fill rate)
- London Kill Zone FVGs fill 84.4% of the time
- 50% CE entry is significantly better than FVG edge entry (62% vs 48%)
- Gold has the highest FVG fill rate (82.7%)
- 70% of FVGs fill within 2 sessions — cancel orders after 3
Next step:
- see today's signals
Next step:
- see today's signals
Next step:
- see today's signals
Next step:
- see today's signals
Next step:
Next step:
- see today's signals
Next step:
- see today's signals
FAQ
What is a Fair Value Gap (FVG) in SMC?
A Fair Value Gap is a 3-candle formation where price moves so quickly it leaves a gap (imbalance) between candle 1's wick and candle 3's wick. Price tends to return to fill this gap because algorithms seek equilibrium.
Why does the 50% CE entry work better than the FVG edge?
The 50% Consequent Encroachment is the midpoint of the FVG. Price often overshoots slightly beyond the edge before filling, triggering stop losses. The 50% CE gives you a better entry price and avoids getting stopped out by minor overshoots.
Should I trade Asian session FVGs?
No. This backtest shows Asian session FVGs only fill 48.3% of the time. London Kill Zone FVGs fill 84.4%. Focus exclusively on London and NY kill zone FVGs.
Risk Disclaimer
*Trading involves significant risk. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The backtest data above is based on historical analysis and does not guarantee future profitability. Always use proper risk management (1-2% per trade) and stop losses.*
Ready to master FVG trading? Get our live SMC signals with FVG analysis on every trade, or start with free signals. Check our performance track record.
